A woman in a small group held her Bible open on her lap and said something the leader hadn't expected. "I don't think I should read this on my own," she said. "I might get it wrong." She wasn't being falsely humble. She genuinely believed the Bible was too complex for ordinary people, that its meaning was locked away behind languages and centuries she couldn't reach. She needed a professional. Maybe several.
Her concern is understandable. But Scripture itself pushes back against it. Two related claims run through the Bible about the Bible: that it is sufficient, and that it is clear. Together they answer the fear she voiced.
What the Bible claims about itself
Paul writes to Timothy that Scripture is "profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:16-17). The word translated "complete" is artios, which means fitted, capable, adequate to the task. Scripture equips the person who reads it for everything God calls them to. That is the sufficiency claim. Not that the Bible answers every question humans can think of, but that it provides everything needed for faith, life, and godliness.
Psalm 19:7-8 makes the same point in the register of poetry: the law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. Notice that last phrase. Making wise the simple. Not the seminary-trained, not the theologically sophisticated. The simple. The person without advanced education or professional credentials.
What sufficiency does not mean
Sufficiency is not a claim that commentaries, teachers, and theological tradition are useless. Paul told the Ephesians that Christ gave the church "pastors and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry" (Ephesians 4:11-12). Teaching is a gift the Spirit gives to the body precisely because we need one another. The point is not that you should never consult a commentary. The point is that the Bible does not require a commentary to be understood on what matters most.
Moses put it plainly to Israel: "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law" (Deuteronomy 29:29). There are depths in God's purposes we are not given access to. That is not a failure of revelation. It is a boundary God set, and accepting it is the faithful posture.
Clear enough for ordinary people
The second claim is perspicuity, a Latin word meaning clarity or transparency. It does not mean every passage of Scripture is equally easy. Peter himself admitted that some of Paul's letters contain things "hard to understand" (2 Peter 3:16). The claim is more modest and more useful than that: the things necessary for salvation and faithful discipleship are set out plainly enough that an ordinary person, reading with ordinary care, can grasp them.
Jesus assumed as much. When a lawyer asked him what he needed to do to inherit eternal life, Jesus answered with a question: "What is written in the Law? How do you read it?" (Luke 10:26). He did not say, "Let me explain this to you because the text requires expertise." He pointed the man back to what was written and asked what he saw. The text was the authority. The reading was the man's responsibility.
Hard passages and honest limits
Acknowledging that some texts are difficult is not a concession that undermines the doctrine. It is a concession the doctrine itself makes. Peter's comment about Paul in 2 Peter 3:16 shows that the earliest Christians knew some Scripture was hard. What he does not conclude is that this difficulty makes Scripture unreliable or accessible only to experts. He warns instead that the "ignorant and unstable" twist such texts to their own destruction. The problem is not obscurity in the text but carelessness in the reader.
Augustine wrote for decades about the depths of Scripture and still insisted that "whatever I find in those writings that is contrary to truth, I reject." Depth and clarity coexist. The ocean has shallow water at the shore and plunges to depths no diver has reached. Children can play safely at the edge. Expert divers spend lifetimes exploring the depths. The water is the same ocean.
What this means for the woman holding her Bible
She is not wrong that she might misread a text. We all do. But her hesitation rests on a false picture of what the Bible is. It is not an encrypted file requiring a specialist to decode. It is a letter from a God who wants to be known, written so that His people, across every century and every level of education, could read and understand what matters most.
The appropriate response to a difficult passage is not to close the book. It is to read more carefully, to ask questions, to consult people wiser than you, and to return to the text with the patience it deserves. What does it say? How do you read it? Those are still the right questions.
This Tuesday, hand your group a passage without any explanation, ask them to read it twice, and then ask what they see. Trust that the Spirit who inspired the text also illuminates it.
Start Growing in Christ through Scripture with Protos
Keep reading
Hermeneutics
Common Interpretive Errors
Most Bible teaching goes wrong before anyone opens their mouth.
Hermeneutics
Word Studies Done Right
You've probably heard it from a pulpit at some point.
Hermeneutics
Why context matters
If you've ever walked into the middle of a conversation, you know how easy it is to misread what's being said.